Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Explore Scientific ED127 FCD-100 vs William Optics FLT 132

Explore Scientific ED127 FCD-100
Explore Scientific

ED127 FCD-100

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

William Optics FLT 132
William Optics

FLT 132

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

Slower by 0.5 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationExplore Scientific ED127 FCD-100William Optics FLT 132
Optics
TypeRefractorrefractor
Optical designTriplet APOApo triplet FPL-53
Aperture127mm132mm
Focal length952mm925mm
Native f/ratiof/7.5f/7.0
Image circle40mm52mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight8.6kg7.9kg
Advantages of Explore Scientific ED127 FCD-100

Closely matched on the compared specs.

Advantages of William Optics FLT 132
  • Faster optics at f/7 vs f/7.5
  • Larger image circle (52mm) — supports bigger sensors
Best for — Explore Scientific ED127 FCD-100
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — William Optics FLT 132
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Explore Scientific ED127 FCD-100 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.17° × 1.44°Scale: 0.81"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.41° × 0.94°Scale: 0.81"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.68° × 0.68°Scale: 0.81"/px
William Optics FLT 132 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.23° × 1.49°Scale: 0.84"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.46° × 0.97°Scale: 0.84"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.70° × 0.70°Scale: 0.84"/px
Explore Scientific ED127 FCD-100 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

William Optics FLT 132 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives