Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Explore Scientific ED127 FCD-100 vs Askar 107PHQ

Explore Scientific ED127 FCD-100
Explore Scientific

ED127 FCD-100

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Askar 107PHQ
Askar

107PHQ

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

+27% focal length
+19% aperture
Slower by 0.5 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationExplore Scientific ED127 FCD-100Askar 107PHQ
Optics
TypeRefractorrefractor
Optical designTriplet APOPetzval quintuplet FPL-51
Aperture127mm107mm
Focal length952mm749mm
Native f/ratiof/7.5f/7.0
Image circle40mm44mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight8.6kg7.5kg
Advantages of Explore Scientific ED127 FCD-100
  • Tighter framing — 952mm vs 749mm focal length
  • 19% more light-gathering aperture
Advantages of Askar 107PHQ
  • Wider field — 749mm vs 952mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/7 vs f/7.5
Best for — Explore Scientific ED127 FCD-100
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Askar 107PHQ
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Explore Scientific ED127 FCD-100 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.17° × 1.44°Scale: 0.81"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.41° × 0.94°Scale: 0.81"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.68° × 0.68°Scale: 0.81"/px
Askar 107PHQ — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.75° × 1.84°Scale: 1.04"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.80° × 1.20°Scale: 1.04"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.86° × 0.86°Scale: 1.04"/px
Explore Scientific ED127 FCD-100 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Askar 107PHQ — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives