telescopecomparison · 2-way
DwarfLab Dwarf II vs Vaonis Vespera
Key differences
-50% focal length
-52% aperture
Specifications
| Specification | DwarfLab Dwarf II | Vaonis Vespera |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | smart-telescope | smart-telescope |
| Optical design | Apo doublet all-in-one | Apo quadruplet all-in-one |
| Aperture | 24mm | 50mm |
| Focal length | 100mm | 200mm |
| Native f/ratio | f/4.2 | f/4.0 |
| Image circle | — | — |
| Full-frame support | No | No |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 1.2kg | 5.0kg |
Advantages of DwarfLab Dwarf II
- Wider field — 100mm vs 200mm focal length
- Lighter (1.2kg vs 5kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of Vaonis Vespera
- Tighter framing — 200mm vs 100mm focal length
- 108% more light-gathering aperture
Best for — DwarfLab Dwarf II
- Wide-field nebulae and Milky Way regions
- Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
Best for — Vaonis Vespera
- Wide-field nebulae and Milky Way regions
- Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
DwarfLab Dwarf II — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 20.63° × 13.75°Scale: 7.76"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 13.47° × 9.00°Scale: 7.76"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 6.47° × 6.47°Scale: 7.76"/px
Vaonis Vespera — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 10.31° × 6.88°Scale: 3.88"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 6.73° × 4.50°Scale: 3.88"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 3.24° × 3.24°Scale: 3.88"/px
DwarfLab Dwarf II — recommended user
Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.
Vaonis Vespera — recommended user
Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.