Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Celestron RASA 8 vs Sky-Watcher Quattro 150P

Celestron RASA 8
Celestron

RASA 8

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a backyard imaging setup.

Sky-Watcher Quattro 150P
Sky-Watcher

Quattro 150P

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

-33% focal length
+35% aperture
Faster by 2.0 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationCelestron RASA 8Sky-Watcher Quattro 150P
Optics
TypeSCTnewtonian
Optical designRowe-Ackermann SchmidtNewtonian astrograph
Aperture203mm150mm
Focal length400mm600mm
Native f/ratiof/2.0f/4.0
Image circle32mm
Full-frame supportNoNo
Physical
Weight7.7kg7.5kg
Advantages of Celestron RASA 8
  • Wider field — 400mm vs 600mm focal length
  • 35% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/2 vs f/4
  • Larger image circle (32mm) — supports bigger sensors
Advantages of Sky-Watcher Quattro 150P
  • Tighter framing — 600mm vs 400mm focal length
Best for — Celestron RASA 8
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
Best for — Sky-Watcher Quattro 150P
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
Celestron RASA 8 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 5.16° × 3.44°Scale: 1.94"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.37° × 2.25°Scale: 1.94"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.62° × 1.62°Scale: 1.94"/px
Sky-Watcher Quattro 150P — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.44° × 2.29°Scale: 1.29"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.24° × 1.50°Scale: 1.29"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.08° × 1.08°Scale: 1.29"/px
Celestron RASA 8 — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a backyard imaging setup.

Sky-Watcher Quattro 150P — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives