Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Celestron RASA 14 vs Vixen R200SS

Celestron RASA 14
Celestron

RASA 14

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

Vixen R200SS
Vixen

R200SS

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

+78% aperture
Faster by 1.8 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationCelestron RASA 14Vixen R200SS
Optics
Typeastrographnewtonian
Optical designRowe-Ackermann Schmidt AstrographNewtonian astrograph
Aperture356mm200mm
Focal length790mm800mm
Native f/ratiof/2.2f/4.0
Image circle52mm
Full-frame supportYesNo
Physical
Weight30.0kg7.5kg
Advantages of Celestron RASA 14
  • 78% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/2.22 vs f/4
  • Larger image circle (52mm) — supports bigger sensors
Advantages of Vixen R200SS
  • Lighter (7.5kg vs 30kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Celestron RASA 14
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Vixen R200SS
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
Celestron RASA 14 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.61° × 1.74°Scale: 0.98"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.70° × 1.14°Scale: 0.98"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.82° × 0.82°Scale: 0.98"/px
Vixen R200SS — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.58° × 1.72°Scale: 0.97"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.68° × 1.12°Scale: 0.97"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.81° × 0.81°Scale: 0.97"/px
Celestron RASA 14 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

Vixen R200SS — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives