Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Celestron RASA 11 vs Sky-Watcher Quattro 150P

Celestron RASA 11
Celestron

RASA 11

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

Sky-Watcher Quattro 150P
Sky-Watcher

Quattro 150P

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

+86% aperture
Faster by 1.8 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationCelestron RASA 11Sky-Watcher Quattro 150P
Optics
Typeastrographnewtonian
Optical designRowe-Ackermann Schmidt AstrographNewtonian astrograph
Aperture279mm150mm
Focal length620mm600mm
Native f/ratiof/2.2f/4.0
Image circle43mm
Full-frame supportYesNo
Physical
Weight20.0kg7.5kg
Advantages of Celestron RASA 11
  • 86% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/2.22 vs f/4
  • Larger image circle (43mm) — supports bigger sensors
Advantages of Sky-Watcher Quattro 150P
  • Lighter (7.5kg vs 20kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Celestron RASA 11
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Sky-Watcher Quattro 150P
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
Celestron RASA 11 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.33° × 2.22°Scale: 1.25"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.17° × 1.45°Scale: 1.25"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.04° × 1.04°Scale: 1.25"/px
Sky-Watcher Quattro 150P — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.44° × 2.29°Scale: 1.29"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.24° × 1.50°Scale: 1.29"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.08° × 1.08°Scale: 1.29"/px
Celestron RASA 11 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

Sky-Watcher Quattro 150P — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives