Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Celestron RASA 11 vs Celestron C9.25 SCT

Celestron RASA 11
Celestron

RASA 11

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

Celestron C9.25 SCT
Celestron

C9.25 SCT

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

-74% focal length
+19% aperture
Faster by 7.8 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationCelestron RASA 11Celestron C9.25 SCT
Optics
Typeastrographsct
Optical designRowe-Ackermann Schmidt AstrographSchmidt-Cassegrain
Aperture279mm235mm
Focal length620mm2350mm
Native f/ratiof/2.2f/10.0
Image circle43mm
Full-frame supportYesNo
Physical
Weight20.0kg9.5kg
Advantages of Celestron RASA 11
  • Wider field — 620mm vs 2350mm focal length
  • 19% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/2.22 vs f/10
  • Larger image circle (43mm) — supports bigger sensors
Advantages of Celestron C9.25 SCT
  • Tighter framing — 2350mm vs 620mm focal length
  • Lighter (9.5kg vs 20kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Celestron RASA 11
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Celestron C9.25 SCT
  • Small galaxies, planetary nebulae, lunar & planetary detail
  • High-resolution long-exposure work
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
Celestron RASA 11 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.33° × 2.22°Scale: 1.25"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.17° × 1.45°Scale: 1.25"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.04° × 1.04°Scale: 1.25"/px
Celestron C9.25 SCT — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.88° × 0.59°Scale: 0.33"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.57° × 0.38°Scale: 0.33"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.28° × 0.28°Scale: 0.33"/px
Celestron RASA 11 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

Celestron C9.25 SCT — recommended user

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives