Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Celestron EdgeHD 9.25 vs Tele Vue NP101is

Celestron EdgeHD 9.25
Celestron

EdgeHD 9.25

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a backyard imaging setup.

Tele Vue NP101is
Tele Vue

NP101is

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

Key differences

+335% focal length
+133% aperture
Slower by 4.6 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationCelestron EdgeHD 9.25Tele Vue NP101is
Optics
TypeSCTRefractor
Optical designAplanatic SCTPetzval
Aperture235mm101mm
Focal length2350mm540mm
Native f/ratiof/10.0f/5.4
Image circle42mm40mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight9.5kg4.5kg
Advantages of Celestron EdgeHD 9.25
  • Tighter framing — 2350mm vs 540mm focal length
  • 133% more light-gathering aperture
Advantages of Tele Vue NP101is
  • Wider field — 540mm vs 2350mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/5.4 vs f/10
  • Lighter (4.5kg vs 9.5kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Celestron EdgeHD 9.25
  • Small galaxies, planetary nebulae, lunar & planetary detail
  • High-resolution long-exposure work
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Tele Vue NP101is
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Celestron EdgeHD 9.25 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.88° × 0.59°Scale: 0.33"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.57° × 0.38°Scale: 0.33"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.28° × 0.28°Scale: 0.33"/px
Tele Vue NP101is — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.82° × 2.55°Scale: 1.44"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.49° × 1.67°Scale: 1.44"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.20° × 1.20°Scale: 1.44"/px
Celestron EdgeHD 9.25 — recommended user

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a backyard imaging setup.

Tele Vue NP101is — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

Recommended alternatives