Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Celestron EdgeHD 9.25 vs Takahashi FSQ-130ED

Celestron EdgeHD 9.25
Celestron

EdgeHD 9.25

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a backyard imaging setup.

Takahashi FSQ-130ED
Takahashi

FSQ-130ED

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

+262% focal length
+81% aperture
Slower by 5.0 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationCelestron EdgeHD 9.25Takahashi FSQ-130ED
Optics
TypeSCTrefractor
Optical designAplanatic SCTPetzval quadruplet
Aperture235mm130mm
Focal length2350mm650mm
Native f/ratiof/10.0f/5.0
Image circle42mm88mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight9.5kg11.0kg
Advantages of Celestron EdgeHD 9.25
  • Tighter framing — 2350mm vs 650mm focal length
  • 81% more light-gathering aperture
Advantages of Takahashi FSQ-130ED
  • Wider field — 650mm vs 2350mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/5 vs f/10
  • Larger image circle (88mm) — supports bigger sensors
Best for — Celestron EdgeHD 9.25
  • Small galaxies, planetary nebulae, lunar & planetary detail
  • High-resolution long-exposure work
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Takahashi FSQ-130ED
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Celestron EdgeHD 9.25 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.88° × 0.59°Scale: 0.33"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.57° × 0.38°Scale: 0.33"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.28° × 0.28°Scale: 0.33"/px
Takahashi FSQ-130ED — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.17° × 2.12°Scale: 1.19"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.07° × 1.38°Scale: 1.19"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.00° × 1.00°Scale: 1.19"/px
Celestron EdgeHD 9.25 — recommended user

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a backyard imaging setup.

Takahashi FSQ-130ED — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives