telescopecomparison · 2-way
Celestron EdgeHD 9.25 vs Celestron C8 SCT
Celestron
EdgeHD 9.25
Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a backyard imaging setup.
Key differences
+16% focal length
+16% aperture
Specifications
| Specification | Celestron EdgeHD 9.25 | Celestron C8 SCT |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | SCT | sct |
| Optical design | Aplanatic SCT | Schmidt-Cassegrain |
| Aperture | 235mm | 203mm |
| Focal length | 2350mm | 2032mm |
| Native f/ratio | f/10.0 | f/10.0 |
| Image circle | 42mm | — |
| Full-frame support | Yes | No |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 9.5kg | 5.7kg |
Advantages of Celestron EdgeHD 9.25
- Tighter framing — 2350mm vs 2032mm focal length
- 16% more light-gathering aperture
- Larger image circle (42mm) — supports bigger sensors
Advantages of Celestron C8 SCT
- Wider field — 2032mm vs 2350mm focal length
- Lighter (5.7kg vs 9.5kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Celestron EdgeHD 9.25
- Small galaxies, planetary nebulae, lunar & planetary detail
- High-resolution long-exposure work
- Faint-object imaging under dark skies
- Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Celestron C8 SCT
- Small galaxies, planetary nebulae, lunar & planetary detail
- High-resolution long-exposure work
- Faint-object imaging under dark skies
Celestron EdgeHD 9.25 — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 0.88° × 0.59°Scale: 0.33"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 0.57° × 0.38°Scale: 0.33"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 0.28° × 0.28°Scale: 0.33"/px
Celestron C8 SCT — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.02° × 0.68°Scale: 0.38"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 0.66° × 0.44°Scale: 0.38"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 0.32° × 0.32°Scale: 0.38"/px
Celestron EdgeHD 9.25 — recommended user
Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a backyard imaging setup.
Celestron C8 SCT — recommended user
Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a backyard imaging setup.