Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Celestron EdgeHD 9.25 vs Borg 107FL

Celestron EdgeHD 9.25
Celestron

EdgeHD 9.25

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a backyard imaging setup.

Borg 107FL
Borg

107FL

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

Key differences

+292% focal length
+120% aperture
Slower by 4.4 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationCelestron EdgeHD 9.25Borg 107FL
Optics
TypeSCTrefractor
Optical designAplanatic SCTApo doublet fluorite
Aperture235mm107mm
Focal length2350mm600mm
Native f/ratiof/10.0f/5.6
Image circle42mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight9.5kg3.5kg
Advantages of Celestron EdgeHD 9.25
  • Tighter framing — 2350mm vs 600mm focal length
  • 120% more light-gathering aperture
  • Larger image circle (42mm) — supports bigger sensors
Advantages of Borg 107FL
  • Wider field — 600mm vs 2350mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/5.6 vs f/10
  • Lighter (3.5kg vs 9.5kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Celestron EdgeHD 9.25
  • Small galaxies, planetary nebulae, lunar & planetary detail
  • High-resolution long-exposure work
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Borg 107FL
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Celestron EdgeHD 9.25 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.88° × 0.59°Scale: 0.33"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.57° × 0.38°Scale: 0.33"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.28° × 0.28°Scale: 0.33"/px
Borg 107FL — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.44° × 2.29°Scale: 1.29"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.24° × 1.50°Scale: 1.29"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.08° × 1.08°Scale: 1.29"/px
Celestron EdgeHD 9.25 — recommended user

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a backyard imaging setup.

Borg 107FL — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

Recommended alternatives