Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Celestron EdgeHD 8 vs Tele Vue NP101is

Celestron EdgeHD 8
Celestron

EdgeHD 8

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a backyard imaging setup.

Tele Vue NP101is
Tele Vue

NP101is

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

Key differences

+276% focal length
+101% aperture
Slower by 4.6 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationCelestron EdgeHD 8Tele Vue NP101is
Optics
TypeSCTRefractor
Optical designAplanatic SCTPetzval
Aperture203mm101mm
Focal length2032mm540mm
Native f/ratiof/10.0f/5.4
Image circle42mm40mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight6.4kg4.5kg
Advantages of Celestron EdgeHD 8
  • Tighter framing — 2032mm vs 540mm focal length
  • 101% more light-gathering aperture
Advantages of Tele Vue NP101is
  • Wider field — 540mm vs 2032mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/5.4 vs f/10
  • Lighter (4.5kg vs 6.4kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Celestron EdgeHD 8
  • Small galaxies, planetary nebulae, lunar & planetary detail
  • High-resolution long-exposure work
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Tele Vue NP101is
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Celestron EdgeHD 8 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.02° × 0.68°Scale: 0.38"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.66° × 0.44°Scale: 0.38"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.32° × 0.32°Scale: 0.38"/px
Tele Vue NP101is — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.82° × 2.55°Scale: 1.44"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.49° × 1.67°Scale: 1.44"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.20° × 1.20°Scale: 1.44"/px
Celestron EdgeHD 8 — recommended user

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a backyard imaging setup.

Tele Vue NP101is — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

Recommended alternatives