Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Celestron EdgeHD 8 vs Takahashi TSA-120

Celestron EdgeHD 8
Celestron

EdgeHD 8

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a backyard imaging setup.

Takahashi TSA-120
Takahashi

TSA-120

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

+126% focal length
+69% aperture
Slower by 2.5 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationCelestron EdgeHD 8Takahashi TSA-120
Optics
TypeSCTRefractor
Optical designAplanatic SCTTriplet APO
Aperture203mm120mm
Focal length2032mm900mm
Native f/ratiof/10.0f/7.5
Image circle42mm44mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight6.4kg7.5kg
Advantages of Celestron EdgeHD 8
  • Tighter framing — 2032mm vs 900mm focal length
  • 69% more light-gathering aperture
Advantages of Takahashi TSA-120
  • Wider field — 900mm vs 2032mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/7.5 vs f/10
Best for — Celestron EdgeHD 8
  • Small galaxies, planetary nebulae, lunar & planetary detail
  • High-resolution long-exposure work
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Takahashi TSA-120
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Celestron EdgeHD 8 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.02° × 0.68°Scale: 0.38"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.66° × 0.44°Scale: 0.38"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.32° × 0.32°Scale: 0.38"/px
Takahashi TSA-120 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.29° × 1.53°Scale: 0.86"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.50° × 1.00°Scale: 0.86"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.72° × 0.72°Scale: 0.86"/px
Celestron EdgeHD 8 — recommended user

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a backyard imaging setup.

Takahashi TSA-120 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives