Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Celestron EdgeHD 8 vs Sky-Watcher Quattro 200P

Celestron EdgeHD 8
Celestron

EdgeHD 8

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a backyard imaging setup.

Sky-Watcher Quattro 200P
Sky-Watcher

Quattro 200P

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

+154% focal length
Slower by 6.0 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationCelestron EdgeHD 8Sky-Watcher Quattro 200P
Optics
TypeSCTNewtonian
Optical designAplanatic SCTImaging Newtonian
Aperture203mm200mm
Focal length2032mm800mm
Native f/ratiof/10.0f/4.0
Image circle42mm32mm
Full-frame supportYesNo
Physical
Weight6.4kg10.5kg
Advantages of Celestron EdgeHD 8
  • Tighter framing — 2032mm vs 800mm focal length
  • Larger image circle (42mm) — supports bigger sensors
  • Lighter (6.4kg vs 10.5kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of Sky-Watcher Quattro 200P
  • Wider field — 800mm vs 2032mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/4 vs f/10
Best for — Celestron EdgeHD 8
  • Small galaxies, planetary nebulae, lunar & planetary detail
  • High-resolution long-exposure work
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Sky-Watcher Quattro 200P
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
Celestron EdgeHD 8 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.02° × 0.68°Scale: 0.38"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.66° × 0.44°Scale: 0.38"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.32° × 0.32°Scale: 0.38"/px
Sky-Watcher Quattro 200P — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.58° × 1.72°Scale: 0.97"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.68° × 1.12°Scale: 0.97"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.81° × 0.81°Scale: 0.97"/px
Celestron EdgeHD 8 — recommended user

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a backyard imaging setup.

Sky-Watcher Quattro 200P — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives