Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Celestron EdgeHD 8 vs Askar SQA106

Celestron EdgeHD 8
Celestron

EdgeHD 8

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a backyard imaging setup.

Askar SQA106
Askar

SQA106

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

+250% focal length
+92% aperture
Slower by 4.5 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationCelestron EdgeHD 8Askar SQA106
Optics
TypeSCTrefractor
Optical designAplanatic SCTQuadruplet astrograph FPL-51
Aperture203mm106mm
Focal length2032mm580mm
Native f/ratiof/10.0f/5.5
Image circle42mm60mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight6.4kg6.5kg
Advantages of Celestron EdgeHD 8
  • Tighter framing — 2032mm vs 580mm focal length
  • 92% more light-gathering aperture
Advantages of Askar SQA106
  • Wider field — 580mm vs 2032mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/5.5 vs f/10
  • Larger image circle (60mm) — supports bigger sensors
Best for — Celestron EdgeHD 8
  • Small galaxies, planetary nebulae, lunar & planetary detail
  • High-resolution long-exposure work
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Askar SQA106
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Celestron EdgeHD 8 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.02° × 0.68°Scale: 0.38"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.66° × 0.44°Scale: 0.38"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.32° × 0.32°Scale: 0.38"/px
Askar SQA106 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.56° × 2.37°Scale: 1.34"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.32° × 1.55°Scale: 1.34"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.12° × 1.12°Scale: 1.34"/px
Celestron EdgeHD 8 — recommended user

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a backyard imaging setup.

Askar SQA106 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives