telescopecomparison · 2-way
Celestron EdgeHD 11 vs Sky-Watcher Quattro 200P
Celestron
EdgeHD 11
Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a permanent observatory setup.
Sky-Watcher
Quattro 200P
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.
Key differences
+250% focal length
+40% aperture
Slower by 6.0 f-stops
Specifications
| Specification | Celestron EdgeHD 11 | Sky-Watcher Quattro 200P |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | sct | Newtonian |
| Optical design | Aplanatic SCT | Imaging Newtonian |
| Aperture | 279mm | 200mm |
| Focal length | 2800mm | 800mm |
| Native f/ratio | f/10.0 | f/4.0 |
| Image circle | 42mm | 32mm |
| Full-frame support | Yes | No |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 12.7kg | 10.5kg |
Advantages of Celestron EdgeHD 11
- Tighter framing — 2800mm vs 800mm focal length
- 40% more light-gathering aperture
- Larger image circle (42mm) — supports bigger sensors
Advantages of Sky-Watcher Quattro 200P
- Wider field — 800mm vs 2800mm focal length
- Faster optics at f/4 vs f/10
- Lighter (10.5kg vs 12.7kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Celestron EdgeHD 11
- Small galaxies, planetary nebulae, lunar & planetary detail
- High-resolution long-exposure work
- Faint-object imaging under dark skies
- Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Sky-Watcher Quattro 200P
- Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
- Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
- Faint-object imaging under dark skies
Celestron EdgeHD 11 — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 0.74° × 0.49°Scale: 0.28"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 0.48° × 0.32°Scale: 0.28"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 0.23° × 0.23°Scale: 0.28"/px
Sky-Watcher Quattro 200P — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 2.58° × 1.72°Scale: 0.97"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.68° × 1.12°Scale: 0.97"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 0.81° × 0.81°Scale: 0.97"/px
Celestron EdgeHD 11 — recommended user
Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a permanent observatory setup.
Sky-Watcher Quattro 200P — recommended user
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.