Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Celestron C8 SCT vs Sky-Watcher Quattro 250P

Celestron C8 SCT
Celestron

C8 SCT

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a backyard imaging setup.

Sky-Watcher Quattro 250P
Sky-Watcher

Quattro 250P

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

Key differences

+103% focal length
-19% aperture
Slower by 6.0 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationCelestron C8 SCTSky-Watcher Quattro 250P
Optics
Typesctnewtonian
Optical designSchmidt-CassegrainNewtonian astrograph
Aperture203mm250mm
Focal length2032mm1000mm
Native f/ratiof/10.0f/4.0
Image circle
Full-frame supportNoYes
Physical
Weight5.7kg15.5kg
Advantages of Celestron C8 SCT
  • Tighter framing — 2032mm vs 1000mm focal length
  • Lighter (5.7kg vs 15.5kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of Sky-Watcher Quattro 250P
  • Wider field — 1000mm vs 2032mm focal length
  • 23% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/4 vs f/10
Best for — Celestron C8 SCT
  • Small galaxies, planetary nebulae, lunar & planetary detail
  • High-resolution long-exposure work
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
Best for — Sky-Watcher Quattro 250P
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Celestron C8 SCT — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.02° × 0.68°Scale: 0.38"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.66° × 0.44°Scale: 0.38"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.32° × 0.32°Scale: 0.38"/px
Sky-Watcher Quattro 250P — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.06° × 1.38°Scale: 0.78"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.35° × 0.90°Scale: 0.78"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.65° × 0.65°Scale: 0.78"/px
Celestron C8 SCT — recommended user

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a backyard imaging setup.

Sky-Watcher Quattro 250P — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

Recommended alternatives