Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Celestron C6 SCT vs Celestron C9.25 SCT

Celestron C6 SCT
Celestron

C6 SCT

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a portable travel rig.

Celestron C9.25 SCT
Celestron

C9.25 SCT

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

-36% focal length
-36% aperture

Specifications

SpecificationCelestron C6 SCTCelestron C9.25 SCT
Optics
Typesctsct
Optical designSchmidt-CassegrainSchmidt-Cassegrain
Aperture150mm235mm
Focal length1500mm2350mm
Native f/ratiof/10.0f/10.0
Image circle
Full-frame supportNoNo
Physical
Weight4.5kg9.5kg
Advantages of Celestron C6 SCT
  • Wider field — 1500mm vs 2350mm focal length
  • Lighter (4.5kg vs 9.5kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of Celestron C9.25 SCT
  • Tighter framing — 2350mm vs 1500mm focal length
  • 57% more light-gathering aperture
Best for — Celestron C6 SCT
  • Small galaxies, planetary nebulae, lunar & planetary detail
  • High-resolution long-exposure work
Best for — Celestron C9.25 SCT
  • Small galaxies, planetary nebulae, lunar & planetary detail
  • High-resolution long-exposure work
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
Celestron C6 SCT — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.38° × 0.92°Scale: 0.52"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.90° × 0.60°Scale: 0.52"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.43° × 0.43°Scale: 0.52"/px
Celestron C9.25 SCT — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.88° × 0.59°Scale: 0.33"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.57° × 0.38°Scale: 0.33"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.28° × 0.28°Scale: 0.33"/px
Celestron C6 SCT — recommended user

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a portable travel rig.

Celestron C9.25 SCT — recommended user

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives