cameracomparison · 2-way
Canon EOS R6 Mark II vs Canon EOS R
Canon
EOS R6 Mark II
A strong fit for photographers stepping into astro pairing with wide-field refractors.
Key differences
Larger pixels (5.94µm vs 5.36µm)
-20% more resolution
Specifications
| Specification | Canon EOS R6 Mark II | Canon EOS R |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | Mirrorless | dslr |
| Sensor | — | Canon FF |
| Sensor tech | CMOS | CMOS |
| Format | Full Frame | Full frame |
| Sensor size | 35.9×23.9mm | 36.0×24.0mm |
| Diagonal | 43.1mm | 43.3mm |
| Pixel size | 5.94µm | 5.36µm |
| Resolution | 6000×4000 | 6720×4480 |
| Megapixels | 24.2MP | 30.3MP |
| Color | Yes | Yes |
| Cooling | ||
| Cooled | No | No |
| Performance | ||
| Full well | — | — |
| Peak QE | — | — |
Advantages of Canon EOS R6 Mark II
- Larger pixels — better low-light per-pixel sensitivity
Advantages of Canon EOS R
- Higher resolution (30.3MP vs 24.2MP)
Best for — Canon EOS R6 Mark II
- Wide-field mosaics and full-frame telescopes
- Fast, low-noise deep-sky at short focal lengths
- One-shot color — quick results, less processing
Best for — Canon EOS R
- Wide-field mosaics and full-frame telescopes
- Fast, low-noise deep-sky at short focal lengths
- One-shot color — quick results, less processing
Canon EOS R6 Mark II — typical FOV & scale
- On 250mm refractor (wide)FOV: 8.23° × 5.48°Scale: 4.90"/px
- On 800mm SCT reducerFOV: 2.57° × 1.71°Scale: 1.53"/px
- On 2000mm SCT nativeFOV: 1.03° × 0.68°Scale: 0.61"/px
Canon EOS R — typical FOV & scale
- On 250mm refractor (wide)FOV: 8.25° × 5.50°Scale: 4.42"/px
- On 800mm SCT reducerFOV: 2.58° × 1.72°Scale: 1.38"/px
- On 2000mm SCT nativeFOV: 1.03° × 0.69°Scale: 0.55"/px
Canon EOS R6 Mark II — recommended user
A strong fit for photographers stepping into astro pairing with wide-field refractors.
Canon EOS R — recommended user
A strong fit for photographers stepping into astro pairing with wide-field refractors.