Astrophotoguru · Compare

cameracomparison · 2-way

Canon EOS R5 vs Canon EOS 90D

Canon EOS R5
Canon

EOS R5

A strong fit for photographers stepping into astro pairing with wide-field refractors.

Canon EOS 90D
Canon

EOS 90D

A strong fit for photographers stepping into astro pairing with a broad range of focal lengths.

Key differences

62% larger sensor
Larger pixels (4.4µm vs 3.2µm)
38% more resolution

Specifications

SpecificationCanon EOS R5Canon EOS 90D
Sensor
TypeMirrorlessdslr
SensorCanon APS-C
Sensor techCMOSCMOS
FormatFull FrameAPS-C
Sensor size36.0×24.0mm22.3×14.8mm
Diagonal43.3mm26.8mm
Pixel size4.40µm3.20µm
Resolution8192×54646960×4640
Megapixels45.0MP32.5MP
ColorYesYes
Cooling
CooledNoNo
Performance
Full well
Peak QE
Advantages of Canon EOS R5
  • Larger sensor (43.3mm vs 26.8mm diagonal) — wider field
  • Larger pixels — better low-light per-pixel sensitivity
  • Higher resolution (45MP vs 32.5MP)
Advantages of Canon EOS 90D
  • Finer sampling at 3.2µm pixels
Best for — Canon EOS R5
  • Wide-field mosaics and full-frame telescopes
  • Fast, low-noise deep-sky at short focal lengths
  • One-shot color — quick results, less processing
Best for — Canon EOS 90D
  • Balanced field for most refractors
  • Well-sampled deep-sky at medium focal lengths
  • One-shot color — quick results, less processing
Canon EOS R5 — typical FOV & scale
  • On 250mm refractor (wide)
    FOV: 8.25° × 5.50°Scale: 3.63"/px
  • On 800mm SCT reducer
    FOV: 2.58° × 1.72°Scale: 1.13"/px
  • On 2000mm SCT native
    FOV: 1.03° × 0.69°Scale: 0.45"/px
Canon EOS 90D — typical FOV & scale
  • On 250mm refractor (wide)
    FOV: 5.11° × 3.39°Scale: 2.64"/px
  • On 800mm SCT reducer
    FOV: 1.60° × 1.06°Scale: 0.83"/px
  • On 2000mm SCT native
    FOV: 0.64° × 0.42°Scale: 0.33"/px
Canon EOS R5 — recommended user

A strong fit for photographers stepping into astro pairing with wide-field refractors.

Canon EOS 90D — recommended user

A strong fit for photographers stepping into astro pairing with a broad range of focal lengths.

Recommended alternatives