Astrophotoguru · Compare

cameracomparison · 2-way

Canon EOS R vs ZWO ASI2400MC Pro

Canon EOS R
Canon

EOS R

A strong fit for photographers stepping into astro pairing with wide-field refractors.

ZWO ASI2400MC Pro
ZWO

ASI2400MC Pro

A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with wide-field refractors.

Key differences

Finer pixels (5.36µm vs 5.94µm)
24% more resolution
Uncooled

Specifications

SpecificationCanon EOS RZWO ASI2400MC Pro
Sensor
TypedslrDedicated Cooled
SensorCanon FFSony IMX410
Sensor techCMOSCMOS
FormatFull frameFull Frame
Sensor size36.0×24.0mm36.0×24.0mm
Diagonal43.3mm43.3mm
Pixel size5.36µm5.94µm
Resolution6720×44806072×4042
Megapixels30.3MP24.5MP
ColorYesYes
Cooling
CooledNoYes
Performance
Full well100000e⁻
Peak QE80%
Advantages of Canon EOS R
  • Higher resolution (30.3MP vs 24.5MP)
Advantages of ZWO ASI2400MC Pro
  • Larger pixels — better low-light per-pixel sensitivity
  • Regulated cooling for long exposures
Best for — Canon EOS R
  • Wide-field mosaics and full-frame telescopes
  • Fast, low-noise deep-sky at short focal lengths
  • One-shot color — quick results, less processing
Best for — ZWO ASI2400MC Pro
  • Wide-field mosaics and full-frame telescopes
  • Fast, low-noise deep-sky at short focal lengths
  • Long-exposure deep-sky under any sky
  • One-shot color — quick results, less processing
Canon EOS R — typical FOV & scale
  • On 250mm refractor (wide)
    FOV: 8.25° × 5.50°Scale: 4.42"/px
  • On 800mm SCT reducer
    FOV: 2.58° × 1.72°Scale: 1.38"/px
  • On 2000mm SCT native
    FOV: 1.03° × 0.69°Scale: 0.55"/px
ZWO ASI2400MC Pro — typical FOV & scale
  • On 250mm refractor (wide)
    FOV: 8.25° × 5.50°Scale: 4.90"/px
  • On 800mm SCT reducer
    FOV: 2.58° × 1.72°Scale: 1.53"/px
  • On 2000mm SCT native
    FOV: 1.03° × 0.69°Scale: 0.61"/px
Canon EOS R — recommended user

A strong fit for photographers stepping into astro pairing with wide-field refractors.

ZWO ASI2400MC Pro — recommended user

A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with wide-field refractors.

Recommended alternatives