telescopecomparison · 2-way
Borg 107FL vs Borg 90FL
Borg
107FL
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.
Key differences
+20% focal length
+19% aperture
Specifications
| Specification | Borg 107FL | Borg 90FL |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | refractor | refractor |
| Optical design | Apo doublet fluorite | Apo doublet fluorite |
| Aperture | 107mm | 90mm |
| Focal length | 600mm | 500mm |
| Native f/ratio | f/5.6 | f/5.6 |
| Image circle | — | — |
| Full-frame support | Yes | No |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 3.5kg | 2.5kg |
Advantages of Borg 107FL
- Tighter framing — 600mm vs 500mm focal length
- 19% more light-gathering aperture
Advantages of Borg 90FL
- Wider field — 500mm vs 600mm focal length
- Lighter (2.5kg vs 3.5kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Borg 107FL
- Large emission nebulae and star clusters
- Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Borg 90FL
- Large emission nebulae and star clusters
Borg 107FL — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 3.44° × 2.29°Scale: 1.29"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 2.24° × 1.50°Scale: 1.29"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.08° × 1.08°Scale: 1.29"/px
Borg 90FL — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 4.13° × 2.75°Scale: 1.55"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 2.69° × 1.80°Scale: 1.55"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.29° × 1.29°Scale: 1.55"/px
Borg 107FL — recommended user
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.
Borg 90FL — recommended user
Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.