Astrophotoguru · Compare

cameracomparison · 2-way

Atik One 6.0 vs ZWO ASI294MM Pro

Atik One 6.0
Atik

One 6.0

A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with longer focal lengths where framing is tight.

ZWO ASI294MM Pro
ZWO

ASI294MM Pro

A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with a broad range of focal lengths.

Key differences

-31% larger sensor
-87% more resolution

Specifications

SpecificationAtik One 6.0ZWO ASI294MM Pro
Sensor
TypededicatedDedicated Cooled
SensorSony ICX694ALGSony IMX492
Sensor techCCDCMOS
Format4/3"4/3"
Sensor size12.5×10.0mm19.1×13.0mm
Diagonal16.0mm23.1mm
Pixel size4.54µm4.63µm
Resolution2749×21998288×5644
Megapixels6.0MP46.8MP
ColorNoNo
Cooling
CooledYesYes
Performance
Full well20000e⁻63700e⁻
Peak QE77%75%
Advantages of Atik One 6.0

Closely matched on the compared specs.

Advantages of ZWO ASI294MM Pro
  • Larger sensor (23.1mm vs 16mm diagonal) — wider field
  • Higher resolution (46.8MP vs 6MP)
Best for — Atik One 6.0
  • Longer focal lengths — tighter framing on small targets
  • Fast, low-noise deep-sky at short focal lengths
  • Long-exposure deep-sky under any sky
  • Narrowband and LRGB workflows
Best for — ZWO ASI294MM Pro
  • Balanced field for most refractors
  • Fast, low-noise deep-sky at short focal lengths
  • Long-exposure deep-sky under any sky
  • Narrowband and LRGB workflows
Atik One 6.0 — typical FOV & scale
  • On 250mm refractor (wide)
    FOV: 2.87° × 2.29°Scale: 3.75"/px
  • On 800mm SCT reducer
    FOV: 0.90° × 0.72°Scale: 1.17"/px
  • On 2000mm SCT native
    FOV: 0.36° × 0.29°Scale: 0.47"/px
ZWO ASI294MM Pro — typical FOV & scale
  • On 250mm refractor (wide)
    FOV: 4.38° × 2.98°Scale: 3.82"/px
  • On 800mm SCT reducer
    FOV: 1.37° × 0.93°Scale: 1.19"/px
  • On 2000mm SCT native
    FOV: 0.55° × 0.37°Scale: 0.48"/px
Atik One 6.0 — recommended user

A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with longer focal lengths where framing is tight.

ZWO ASI294MM Pro — recommended user

A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with a broad range of focal lengths.

Recommended alternatives