Astrophotoguru · Compare

cameracomparison · 2-way

Atik One 6.0 vs Atik 383L+

Atik One 6.0
Atik

One 6.0

A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with longer focal lengths where framing is tight.

Atik 383L+
Atik

383L+

A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with a broad range of focal lengths.

Key differences

-29% larger sensor
Finer pixels (4.54µm vs 5.4µm)
-29% more resolution

Specifications

SpecificationAtik One 6.0Atik 383L+
Sensor
Typededicateddedicated
SensorSony ICX694ALGKodak KAF-8300
Sensor techCCDCCD
Format4/3"4/3"
Sensor size12.5×10.0mm18.0×13.5mm
Diagonal16.0mm22.5mm
Pixel size4.54µm5.40µm
Resolution2749×21993362×2504
Megapixels6.0MP8.4MP
ColorNoNo
Cooling
CooledYesYes
Performance
Full well20000e⁻25500e⁻
Peak QE77%56%
Advantages of Atik One 6.0
  • Finer sampling at 4.54µm pixels
Advantages of Atik 383L+
  • Larger sensor (22.5mm vs 16mm diagonal) — wider field
  • Larger pixels — better low-light per-pixel sensitivity
  • Higher resolution (8.4MP vs 6MP)
Best for — Atik One 6.0
  • Longer focal lengths — tighter framing on small targets
  • Fast, low-noise deep-sky at short focal lengths
  • Long-exposure deep-sky under any sky
  • Narrowband and LRGB workflows
Best for — Atik 383L+
  • Balanced field for most refractors
  • Fast, low-noise deep-sky at short focal lengths
  • Long-exposure deep-sky under any sky
  • Narrowband and LRGB workflows
Atik One 6.0 — typical FOV & scale
  • On 250mm refractor (wide)
    FOV: 2.87° × 2.29°Scale: 3.75"/px
  • On 800mm SCT reducer
    FOV: 0.90° × 0.72°Scale: 1.17"/px
  • On 2000mm SCT native
    FOV: 0.36° × 0.29°Scale: 0.47"/px
Atik 383L+ — typical FOV & scale
  • On 250mm refractor (wide)
    FOV: 4.13° × 3.09°Scale: 4.46"/px
  • On 800mm SCT reducer
    FOV: 1.29° × 0.97°Scale: 1.39"/px
  • On 2000mm SCT native
    FOV: 0.52° × 0.39°Scale: 0.56"/px
Atik One 6.0 — recommended user

A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with longer focal lengths where framing is tight.

Atik 383L+ — recommended user

A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with a broad range of focal lengths.

Recommended alternatives