Astrophotoguru · Compare

cameracomparison · 2-way

Atik Horizon II vs ZWO ASI294MC Pro

Atik Horizon II
Atik

Horizon II

A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with a broad range of focal lengths.

ZWO ASI294MC Pro
ZWO

ASI294MC Pro

A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with a broad range of focal lengths.

Key differences

Finer pixels (3.8µm vs 4.63µm)
39% more resolution

Specifications

SpecificationAtik Horizon IIZWO ASI294MC Pro
Sensor
TypededicatedDedicated Cooled
SensorPanasonic MN34230Sony IMX294
Sensor techCMOSCMOS
Format4/3"4/3"
Sensor size17.7×13.4mm19.1×13.0mm
Diagonal22.2mm23.1mm
Pixel size3.80µm4.63µm
Resolution4644×35064144×2822
Megapixels16.3MP11.7MP
ColorYesYes
Cooling
CooledYesYes
Performance
Full well20000e⁻63700e⁻
Peak QE60%75%
Advantages of Atik Horizon II
  • Finer sampling at 3.8µm pixels
  • Higher resolution (16.3MP vs 11.7MP)
Advantages of ZWO ASI294MC Pro
  • Larger pixels — better low-light per-pixel sensitivity
Best for — Atik Horizon II
  • Balanced field for most refractors
  • Well-sampled deep-sky at medium focal lengths
  • Long-exposure deep-sky under any sky
  • One-shot color — quick results, less processing
Best for — ZWO ASI294MC Pro
  • Balanced field for most refractors
  • Fast, low-noise deep-sky at short focal lengths
  • Long-exposure deep-sky under any sky
  • One-shot color — quick results, less processing
Atik Horizon II — typical FOV & scale
  • On 250mm refractor (wide)
    FOV: 4.06° × 3.07°Scale: 3.14"/px
  • On 800mm SCT reducer
    FOV: 1.27° × 0.96°Scale: 0.98"/px
  • On 2000mm SCT native
    FOV: 0.51° × 0.38°Scale: 0.39"/px
ZWO ASI294MC Pro — typical FOV & scale
  • On 250mm refractor (wide)
    FOV: 4.38° × 2.98°Scale: 3.82"/px
  • On 800mm SCT reducer
    FOV: 1.37° × 0.93°Scale: 1.19"/px
  • On 2000mm SCT native
    FOV: 0.55° × 0.37°Scale: 0.48"/px
Atik Horizon II — recommended user

A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with a broad range of focal lengths.

ZWO ASI294MC Pro — recommended user

A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with a broad range of focal lengths.

Recommended alternatives