Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Astro-Tech AT10RC vs Meade LX200 10" ACF

Astro-Tech AT10RC
Astro-Tech

AT10RC

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a permanent observatory setup.

Meade LX200 10" ACF
Meade

LX200 10" ACF

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a permanent observatory setup.

Key differences

-21% focal length
Faster by 2.0 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationAstro-Tech AT10RCMeade LX200 10" ACF
Optics
Typeritchey-chretiensct
Optical designTruss Ritchey-ChrétienAdvanced Coma-Free
Aperture254mm254mm
Focal length2000mm2540mm
Native f/ratiof/8.0f/10.0
Image circle
Full-frame supportYesNo
Physical
Weight17.7kg13.6kg
Advantages of Astro-Tech AT10RC
  • Wider field — 2000mm vs 2540mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/8 vs f/10
Advantages of Meade LX200 10" ACF
  • Tighter framing — 2540mm vs 2000mm focal length
  • Lighter (13.6kg vs 17.7kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Astro-Tech AT10RC
  • Small galaxies, planetary nebulae, lunar & planetary detail
  • High-resolution long-exposure work
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Meade LX200 10" ACF
  • Small galaxies, planetary nebulae, lunar & planetary detail
  • High-resolution long-exposure work
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
Astro-Tech AT10RC — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.03° × 0.69°Scale: 0.39"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.67° × 0.45°Scale: 0.39"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.32° × 0.32°Scale: 0.39"/px
Meade LX200 10" ACF — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.81° × 0.54°Scale: 0.31"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.53° × 0.35°Scale: 0.31"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.25° × 0.25°Scale: 0.31"/px
Astro-Tech AT10RC — recommended user

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a permanent observatory setup.

Meade LX200 10" ACF — recommended user

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a permanent observatory setup.

Recommended alternatives