telescopecomparison · 2-way
Askar FRA600 vs SharpStar 94EDPH
Askar
FRA600
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.
SharpStar
94EDPH
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.
Key differences
+16% focal length
+15% aperture
Specifications
| Specification | Askar FRA600 | SharpStar 94EDPH |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | Refractor | refractor |
| Optical design | Petzval Quintuplet APO | Apo triplet FPL-53 |
| Aperture | 108mm | 94mm |
| Focal length | 600mm | 518mm |
| Native f/ratio | f/5.6 | f/5.5 |
| Image circle | 60mm | 44mm |
| Full-frame support | Yes | Yes |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 7.8kg | 4.5kg |
Advantages of Askar FRA600
- Tighter framing — 600mm vs 518mm focal length
- 15% more light-gathering aperture
- Larger image circle (60mm) — supports bigger sensors
Advantages of SharpStar 94EDPH
- Wider field — 518mm vs 600mm focal length
- Lighter (4.5kg vs 7.8kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Askar FRA600
- Large emission nebulae and star clusters
- Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — SharpStar 94EDPH
- Large emission nebulae and star clusters
- Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Askar FRA600 — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 3.44° × 2.29°Scale: 1.29"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 2.24° × 1.50°Scale: 1.29"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.08° × 1.08°Scale: 1.29"/px
SharpStar 94EDPH — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 3.98° × 2.65°Scale: 1.50"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 2.60° × 1.74°Scale: 1.50"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.25° × 1.25°Scale: 1.50"/px
Askar FRA600 — recommended user
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.
SharpStar 94EDPH — recommended user
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.