Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Askar FRA600 vs Meade Series 6000 80mm ED Triplet

Askar FRA600
Askar

FRA600

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Meade Series 6000 80mm ED Triplet
Meade

Series 6000 80mm ED Triplet

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Key differences

+25% focal length
+35% aperture
Faster by 0.4 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationAskar FRA600Meade Series 6000 80mm ED Triplet
Optics
TypeRefractorrefractor
Optical designPetzval Quintuplet APOApo triplet
Aperture108mm80mm
Focal length600mm480mm
Native f/ratiof/5.6f/6.0
Image circle60mm44mm
Full-frame supportYesNo
Physical
Weight7.8kg4.5kg
Advantages of Askar FRA600
  • Tighter framing — 600mm vs 480mm focal length
  • 35% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/5.6 vs f/6
  • Larger image circle (60mm) — supports bigger sensors
Advantages of Meade Series 6000 80mm ED Triplet
  • Wider field — 480mm vs 600mm focal length
  • Lighter (4.5kg vs 7.8kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Askar FRA600
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Meade Series 6000 80mm ED Triplet
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
Askar FRA600 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.44° × 2.29°Scale: 1.29"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.24° × 1.50°Scale: 1.29"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.08° × 1.08°Scale: 1.29"/px
Meade Series 6000 80mm ED Triplet — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.30° × 2.86°Scale: 1.62"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.81° × 1.87°Scale: 1.62"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.35° × 1.35°Scale: 1.62"/px
Askar FRA600 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Meade Series 6000 80mm ED Triplet — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Recommended alternatives