telescopecomparison · 2-way
Askar FRA600 vs Askar 71F
Askar
FRA600
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.
Key differences
+22% focal length
+52% aperture
Faster by 1.3 f-stops
Specifications
| Specification | Askar FRA600 | Askar 71F |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | Refractor | refractor |
| Optical design | Petzval Quintuplet APO | Petzval quintuplet FPL-51 |
| Aperture | 108mm | 71mm |
| Focal length | 600mm | 490mm |
| Native f/ratio | f/5.6 | f/6.9 |
| Image circle | 60mm | 44mm |
| Full-frame support | Yes | Yes |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 7.8kg | 3.2kg |
Advantages of Askar FRA600
- Tighter framing — 600mm vs 490mm focal length
- 52% more light-gathering aperture
- Faster optics at f/5.6 vs f/6.9
- Larger image circle (60mm) — supports bigger sensors
Advantages of Askar 71F
- Wider field — 490mm vs 600mm focal length
- Lighter (3.2kg vs 7.8kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Askar FRA600
- Large emission nebulae and star clusters
- Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Askar 71F
- Large emission nebulae and star clusters
- Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Askar FRA600 — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 3.44° × 2.29°Scale: 1.29"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 2.24° × 1.50°Scale: 1.29"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.08° × 1.08°Scale: 1.29"/px
Askar 71F — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 4.21° × 2.81°Scale: 1.58"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 2.75° × 1.84°Scale: 1.58"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.32° × 1.32°Scale: 1.58"/px
Askar FRA600 — recommended user
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.
Askar 71F — recommended user
Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.