Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Askar FRA500 vs TS-Optics PHOTOLINE 80 f/6 Triplet APO

Askar FRA500
Askar

FRA500

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a backyard imaging setup.

TS-Optics PHOTOLINE 80 f/6 Triplet APO
TS-Optics

PHOTOLINE 80 f/6 Triplet APO

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Key differences

+13% aperture
Faster by 0.4 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationAskar FRA500TS-Optics PHOTOLINE 80 f/6 Triplet APO
Optics
TypeRefractorrefractor
Optical designPetzval Quintuplet APOApo triplet FPL-53
Aperture90mm80mm
Focal length500mm480mm
Native f/ratiof/5.6f/6.0
Image circle60mm44mm
Full-frame supportYesNo
Physical
Weight5.4kg4.4kg
Advantages of Askar FRA500
  • 13% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/5.6 vs f/6
  • Larger image circle (60mm) — supports bigger sensors
Advantages of TS-Optics PHOTOLINE 80 f/6 Triplet APO
  • Lighter (4.4kg vs 5.4kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Askar FRA500
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — TS-Optics PHOTOLINE 80 f/6 Triplet APO
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
Askar FRA500 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.13° × 2.75°Scale: 1.55"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.69° × 1.80°Scale: 1.55"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.29° × 1.29°Scale: 1.55"/px
TS-Optics PHOTOLINE 80 f/6 Triplet APO — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.30° × 2.86°Scale: 1.62"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.81° × 1.87°Scale: 1.62"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.35° × 1.35°Scale: 1.62"/px
Askar FRA500 — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a backyard imaging setup.

TS-Optics PHOTOLINE 80 f/6 Triplet APO — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Recommended alternatives