Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Askar FRA500 vs Borg 90FL

Askar FRA500
Askar

FRA500

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a backyard imaging setup.

Borg 90FL
Borg

90FL

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Specifications

SpecificationAskar FRA500Borg 90FL
Optics
TypeRefractorrefractor
Optical designPetzval Quintuplet APOApo doublet fluorite
Aperture90mm90mm
Focal length500mm500mm
Native f/ratiof/5.6f/5.6
Image circle60mm
Full-frame supportYesNo
Physical
Weight5.4kg2.5kg
Advantages of Askar FRA500
  • Larger image circle (60mm) — supports bigger sensors
Advantages of Borg 90FL
  • Lighter (2.5kg vs 5.4kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Askar FRA500
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Borg 90FL
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
Askar FRA500 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.13° × 2.75°Scale: 1.55"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.69° × 1.80°Scale: 1.55"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.29° × 1.29°Scale: 1.55"/px
Borg 90FL — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.13° × 2.75°Scale: 1.55"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.69° × 1.80°Scale: 1.55"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.29° × 1.29°Scale: 1.55"/px
Askar FRA500 — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a backyard imaging setup.

Borg 90FL — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Recommended alternatives