Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Askar FRA400 vs Askar SQA85

Askar FRA400
Askar

FRA400

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Askar SQA85
Askar

SQA85

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Key differences

-20% focal length
-15% aperture

Specifications

SpecificationAskar FRA400Askar SQA85
Optics
TypeRefractorrefractor
Optical designPetzval Quintuplet APOQuadruplet astrograph FPL-51
Aperture72mm85mm
Focal length400mm500mm
Native f/ratiof/5.6f/5.8
Image circle44mm52mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight3.9kg4.4kg
Advantages of Askar FRA400
  • Wider field — 400mm vs 500mm focal length
Advantages of Askar SQA85
  • Tighter framing — 500mm vs 400mm focal length
  • 18% more light-gathering aperture
  • Larger image circle (52mm) — supports bigger sensors
Best for — Askar FRA400
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Askar SQA85
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Askar FRA400 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 5.16° × 3.44°Scale: 1.94"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.37° × 2.25°Scale: 1.94"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.62° × 1.62°Scale: 1.94"/px
Askar SQA85 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.13° × 2.75°Scale: 1.55"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.69° × 1.80°Scale: 1.55"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.29° × 1.29°Scale: 1.55"/px
Askar FRA400 — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Askar SQA85 — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Recommended alternatives