telescopecomparison · 2-way
Askar 80PHQ vs Askar SQA85
Askar
80PHQ
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.
Key differences
+20% focal length
-6% aperture
Slower by 1.7 f-stops
Specifications
| Specification | Askar 80PHQ | Askar SQA85 |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | refractor | refractor |
| Optical design | Petzval quintuplet FPL-51 | Quadruplet astrograph FPL-51 |
| Aperture | 80mm | 85mm |
| Focal length | 600mm | 500mm |
| Native f/ratio | f/7.5 | f/5.8 |
| Image circle | 44mm | 52mm |
| Full-frame support | Yes | Yes |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 4.5kg | 4.4kg |
Advantages of Askar 80PHQ
- Tighter framing — 600mm vs 500mm focal length
Advantages of Askar SQA85
- Wider field — 500mm vs 600mm focal length
- Faster optics at f/5.8 vs f/7.5
- Larger image circle (52mm) — supports bigger sensors
Best for — Askar 80PHQ
- Large emission nebulae and star clusters
- Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Askar SQA85
- Large emission nebulae and star clusters
- Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Askar 80PHQ — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 3.44° × 2.29°Scale: 1.29"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 2.24° × 1.50°Scale: 1.29"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.08° × 1.08°Scale: 1.29"/px
Askar SQA85 — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 4.13° × 2.75°Scale: 1.55"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 2.69° × 1.80°Scale: 1.55"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.29° × 1.29°Scale: 1.55"/px
Askar 80PHQ — recommended user
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.
Askar SQA85 — recommended user
Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.