Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Askar 71F vs Sky-Watcher Evolux 82ED

Askar 71F
Askar

71F

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Sky-Watcher Evolux 82ED
Sky-Watcher

Evolux 82ED

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Key differences

-13% aperture
Slower by 0.8 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationAskar 71FSky-Watcher Evolux 82ED
Optics
Typerefractorrefractor
Optical designPetzval quintuplet FPL-51Apo doublet FPL-53
Aperture71mm82mm
Focal length490mm499mm
Native f/ratiof/6.9f/6.1
Image circle44mm44mm
Full-frame supportYesNo
Physical
Weight3.2kg3.6kg
Advantages of Askar 71F

Closely matched on the compared specs.

Advantages of Sky-Watcher Evolux 82ED
  • 15% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/6.1 vs f/6.9
Best for — Askar 71F
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Sky-Watcher Evolux 82ED
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
Askar 71F — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.21° × 2.81°Scale: 1.58"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.75° × 1.84°Scale: 1.58"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.32° × 1.32°Scale: 1.58"/px
Sky-Watcher Evolux 82ED — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.13° × 2.76°Scale: 1.55"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.70° × 1.80°Scale: 1.55"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.30° × 1.30°Scale: 1.55"/px
Askar 71F — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Sky-Watcher Evolux 82ED — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Recommended alternatives