telescopecomparison · 2-way
Askar 65PHQ vs Askar 120APO
Askar
120APO
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.
Key differences
-50% focal length
-46% aperture
Faster by 0.6 f-stops
Specifications
| Specification | Askar 65PHQ | Askar 120APO |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | Refractor | Refractor |
| Optical design | Quintuplet Petzval | Triplet APO |
| Aperture | 65mm | 120mm |
| Focal length | 416mm | 840mm |
| Native f/ratio | f/6.4 | f/7.0 |
| Image circle | 44mm | 44mm |
| Full-frame support | Yes | Yes |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 3.6kg | 8.5kg |
Advantages of Askar 65PHQ
- Wider field — 416mm vs 840mm focal length
- Faster optics at f/6.4 vs f/7
- Lighter (3.6kg vs 8.5kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of Askar 120APO
- Tighter framing — 840mm vs 416mm focal length
- 85% more light-gathering aperture
Best for — Askar 65PHQ
- Large emission nebulae and star clusters
- Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Askar 120APO
- Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
- Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Askar 65PHQ — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 4.96° × 3.31°Scale: 1.86"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 3.24° × 2.16°Scale: 1.86"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.56° × 1.56°Scale: 1.86"/px
Askar 120APO — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 2.46° × 1.64°Scale: 0.92"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.60° × 1.07°Scale: 0.92"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 0.77° × 0.77°Scale: 0.92"/px
Askar 65PHQ — recommended user
Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.
Askar 120APO — recommended user
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.