Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Askar 151PHQ vs Takahashi TSA-120

Askar 151PHQ
Askar

151PHQ

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

Takahashi TSA-120
Takahashi

TSA-120

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

+17% focal length
+26% aperture
Faster by 0.5 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationAskar 151PHQTakahashi TSA-120
Optics
TyperefractorRefractor
Optical designPetzval quintuplet FPL-51Triplet APO
Aperture151mm120mm
Focal length1057mm900mm
Native f/ratiof/7.0f/7.5
Image circle60mm44mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight15.5kg7.5kg
Advantages of Askar 151PHQ
  • Tighter framing — 1057mm vs 900mm focal length
  • 26% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/7 vs f/7.5
  • Larger image circle (60mm) — supports bigger sensors
Advantages of Takahashi TSA-120
  • Wider field — 900mm vs 1057mm focal length
  • Lighter (7.5kg vs 15.5kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Askar 151PHQ
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Takahashi TSA-120
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Askar 151PHQ — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.95° × 1.30°Scale: 0.73"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.27° × 0.85°Scale: 0.73"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.61° × 0.61°Scale: 0.73"/px
Takahashi TSA-120 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.29° × 1.53°Scale: 0.86"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.50° × 1.00°Scale: 0.86"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.72° × 0.72°Scale: 0.86"/px
Askar 151PHQ — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

Takahashi TSA-120 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives