Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Askar 130PHQ vs Tele Vue TV-76

Askar 130PHQ
Askar

130PHQ

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Tele Vue TV-76
Tele Vue

TV-76

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Key differences

+108% focal length
+71% aperture
Slower by 1.4 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationAskar 130PHQTele Vue TV-76
Optics
Typerefractorrefractor
Optical designPetzval quintuplet FPL-51Apo doublet
Aperture130mm76mm
Focal length1000mm480mm
Native f/ratiof/7.7f/6.3
Image circle60mm
Full-frame supportYesNo
Physical
Weight10.2kg2.3kg
Advantages of Askar 130PHQ
  • Tighter framing — 1000mm vs 480mm focal length
  • 71% more light-gathering aperture
  • Larger image circle (60mm) — supports bigger sensors
Advantages of Tele Vue TV-76
  • Wider field — 480mm vs 1000mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/6.3 vs f/7.7
  • Lighter (2.3kg vs 10.2kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Askar 130PHQ
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Tele Vue TV-76
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
Askar 130PHQ — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.06° × 1.38°Scale: 0.78"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.35° × 0.90°Scale: 0.78"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.65° × 0.65°Scale: 0.78"/px
Tele Vue TV-76 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.30° × 2.86°Scale: 1.62"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.81° × 1.87°Scale: 1.62"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.35° × 1.35°Scale: 1.62"/px
Askar 130PHQ — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Tele Vue TV-76 — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Recommended alternatives