telescopecomparison · 2-way
Askar 130PHQ vs Sky-Watcher Evolux 82ED
Askar
130PHQ
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.
Sky-Watcher
Evolux 82ED
Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.
Key differences
+100% focal length
+59% aperture
Slower by 1.6 f-stops
Specifications
| Specification | Askar 130PHQ | Sky-Watcher Evolux 82ED |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | refractor | refractor |
| Optical design | Petzval quintuplet FPL-51 | Apo doublet FPL-53 |
| Aperture | 130mm | 82mm |
| Focal length | 1000mm | 499mm |
| Native f/ratio | f/7.7 | f/6.1 |
| Image circle | 60mm | 44mm |
| Full-frame support | Yes | No |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 10.2kg | 3.6kg |
Advantages of Askar 130PHQ
- Tighter framing — 1000mm vs 499mm focal length
- 59% more light-gathering aperture
- Larger image circle (60mm) — supports bigger sensors
Advantages of Sky-Watcher Evolux 82ED
- Wider field — 499mm vs 1000mm focal length
- Faster optics at f/6.1 vs f/7.7
- Lighter (3.6kg vs 10.2kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Askar 130PHQ
- Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
- Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Sky-Watcher Evolux 82ED
- Large emission nebulae and star clusters
Askar 130PHQ — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 2.06° × 1.38°Scale: 0.78"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.35° × 0.90°Scale: 0.78"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 0.65° × 0.65°Scale: 0.78"/px
Sky-Watcher Evolux 82ED — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 4.13° × 2.76°Scale: 1.55"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 2.70° × 1.80°Scale: 1.55"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.30° × 1.30°Scale: 1.55"/px
Askar 130PHQ — recommended user
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.
Sky-Watcher Evolux 82ED — recommended user
Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.