telescopecomparison · 2-way
Askar 120APO vs Askar 80PHQ
Askar
120APO
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.
Askar
80PHQ
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.
Key differences
+40% focal length
+50% aperture
Faster by 0.5 f-stops
Specifications
| Specification | Askar 120APO | Askar 80PHQ |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | Refractor | refractor |
| Optical design | Triplet APO | Petzval quintuplet FPL-51 |
| Aperture | 120mm | 80mm |
| Focal length | 840mm | 600mm |
| Native f/ratio | f/7.0 | f/7.5 |
| Image circle | 44mm | 44mm |
| Full-frame support | Yes | Yes |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 8.5kg | 4.5kg |
Advantages of Askar 120APO
- Tighter framing — 840mm vs 600mm focal length
- 50% more light-gathering aperture
- Faster optics at f/7 vs f/7.5
Advantages of Askar 80PHQ
- Wider field — 600mm vs 840mm focal length
- Lighter (4.5kg vs 8.5kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Askar 120APO
- Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
- Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Askar 80PHQ
- Large emission nebulae and star clusters
- Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Askar 120APO — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 2.46° × 1.64°Scale: 0.92"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.60° × 1.07°Scale: 0.92"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 0.77° × 0.77°Scale: 0.92"/px
Askar 80PHQ — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 3.44° × 2.29°Scale: 1.29"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 2.24° × 1.50°Scale: 1.29"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.08° × 1.08°Scale: 1.29"/px
Askar 120APO — recommended user
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.
Askar 80PHQ — recommended user
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.