telescopecomparison · 2-way
Askar 107PHQ vs SharpStar 94EDPH
Askar
107PHQ
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.
SharpStar
94EDPH
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.
Key differences
+45% focal length
+14% aperture
Slower by 1.5 f-stops
Specifications
| Specification | Askar 107PHQ | SharpStar 94EDPH |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | refractor | refractor |
| Optical design | Petzval quintuplet FPL-51 | Apo triplet FPL-53 |
| Aperture | 107mm | 94mm |
| Focal length | 749mm | 518mm |
| Native f/ratio | f/7.0 | f/5.5 |
| Image circle | 44mm | 44mm |
| Full-frame support | Yes | Yes |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 7.5kg | 4.5kg |
Advantages of Askar 107PHQ
- Tighter framing — 749mm vs 518mm focal length
- 14% more light-gathering aperture
Advantages of SharpStar 94EDPH
- Wider field — 518mm vs 749mm focal length
- Faster optics at f/5.5 vs f/7
- Lighter (4.5kg vs 7.5kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Askar 107PHQ
- Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
- Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — SharpStar 94EDPH
- Large emission nebulae and star clusters
- Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Askar 107PHQ — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 2.75° × 1.84°Scale: 1.04"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.80° × 1.20°Scale: 1.04"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 0.86° × 0.86°Scale: 1.04"/px
SharpStar 94EDPH — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 3.98° × 2.65°Scale: 1.50"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 2.60° × 1.74°Scale: 1.50"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.25° × 1.25°Scale: 1.50"/px
Askar 107PHQ — recommended user
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.
SharpStar 94EDPH — recommended user
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.